Equality Law at Work 2018 - a guide for trade unions and working people (October 2018)

Chapter 13

Demonstrating discrimination in appraisal and performance management

[ch 13: pages 99-100]

Every case is different, but here are some factors that could help support a member’s case that they have suffered direct discrimination in the context of performance management:

• actual comparator(s) — workers on the same grade without the protected characteristic who have not been given a negative performance ranking, or who have been awarded a higher performance ranking. This is the best evidence. Comparators should be as similar as possible;

• evidence that the worker’s performance met the standards set by the performance management policy;

• changes in an employer’s behaviour, for example, invoking formal performance management after an employee announces her pregnancy;

• the employer’s explanation for the difference — both written and face-to-face. Are they consistent and credible?

• lack of clear rules and procedures, vague or subjective criteria, too much management discretion, or no peer review process to check that outcomes are consistent and fair;

• failure to follow the EHRC Code;

• discriminatory language or behaviour by managers implementing the performance management process; and

• statistical evidence of poor outcomes by members sharing protected characteristics.


This information is copyright to the Labour Research Department (LRD) and may not be reproduced without the permission of the LRD.