Unfair dismissal - a legal guide for union reps (November 2014)

Chapter 9

Polkey reductions

[ch 9: page 84]

Compensation can also be reduced by a percentage to reflect the likelihood that if a fair procedure had been followed, the employee would still have been dismissed. This is known as a Polkey reduction, after the case in which the principle was established, Polkey v Dayton Services Limited [1987] 3AER 974. It is up to the employer to persuade the tribunal that the employee would have been dismissed anyway. Typical examples include:

• where an employee is selected for redundancy using an unfair procedure but the employer shows that using a fair procedure, the claimant would still have been selected; or

• the evidence shows that an employee on long-term sickness absence would have been too sick to return to work even with reasonable adjustments, but the employer failed to consult fairly before deciding to dismiss.


This information is copyright to the Labour Research Department (LRD) and may not be reproduced without the permission of the LRD.