LRD guides and handbook June 2016

Law at Work 2016

Chapter 3

Written statement of employment particulars 


[ch 3: pages 74-77]

Under sections 1 and 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 96), employees have the right to a written statement of particulars of their employment. This must be provided no later than eight weeks after the employment begins, and must include:


• the names of the employer and the employee;


• the date the employment began and the period of continuous employment;


• the scale and rate of remuneration, pay intervals and the method of calculating pay;


• terms relating to hours of work and any terms as to normal working hours;


• holiday entitlement and holiday pay, including public holidays, and any entitlement to accrued holiday pay on termination of the employment;


• rules about sickness or injury absence and sick pay;


• pensions and pension schemes;


• length of notice the employee is obliged to give and entitled to receive;


• job title or a brief description of duties;


• whether the employment is permanent or, if it is fixed-term, the date when it is expected to end;


• place of work, or if the employee is required or permitted to work at various places, confirmation of this and the employer’s address;


• details of the employer’s disciplinary and grievance procedures, or information about where to find them (See Chapter 10);


• any collective agreements affecting the employment contract;


• certain further particulars where the employment is outside the UK for more than a month each year. 


Information about sickness absence procedures, sick pay and pensions can be included in another document, such as a handbook, that the employee has reasonable opportunity to read at work.


If overtime is an essential element of the contractual relationship, so that employees should normally do it if requested, it must be referred to in the written statement (Lange v Georg Schunemann GmbH [2001] IRLR 244).


Simply providing details of the job title without any further description is not sufficient (Kampelmann and others v Landschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe [1998] IRLR 333).


In relation to notice requirements, it is enough for the written statement to refer the employee to the law on the matter (see Chapter 10: Termination with/without notice) or to a collective agreement, as long as there are opportunities to see it at work. 


If there are no terms relating to any of the above items, this also must be stated. 


The right to a written statement is not restricted to new employees. Existing employees can ask for a statement of their particulars if they do not have one. 


If the employer does not provide a written statement, or fails to update the statement following a change to the contract terms, the employee can refer the matter to a tribunal at any time while they are working for the employer, or within three months of the ending of the employment. 


There are tribunal fees — an issue fee of £160 and a hearing fee of £230 — for this kind of claim. The first mandatory step is to submit a completed Acas Early Conciliation Notification Form, available from the Acas website. This must be done within the three-month time period for making the claim. For information on fees, “help with fees”, and Acas Early Conciliation see Chapter 13.


There is the possibility of compensation of between two to four weeks‘ pay capped at £479 per week (2016-17) from an employer that has failed to provide a written statement within two months of the employment start date. However, compensation is only available if another statutory claim, such as a claim for unfair dismissal or discrimination, is successful (Advanced Collection Systems v Gultekin [2015] UKEAT 0377/14/0602). There is no freestanding right to compensation for failure to provide the statement. 


An employment tribunal can look at all the evidence to decide what employment terms and conditions the parties must have agreed, but the tribunal is not allowed to rewrite those terms (Eagland v BT [1992] IRLR 323, Consistent Group Limited v Kalwak [2008] EWCA Civ 430). 


An employment tribunal can make a declaration confirming the content of the written statement of employment particulars and can amend the written statement so that it reflects the contract terms that were agreed between the parties (section 12, ERA 96). This is a potentially useful remedy for group claims. For example:


Staff terms and conditions at the National Audit Office (NAO) were regulated by a collective agreement with the recognised union, the Public and Commercial Services union (PCS). The NAO attempted to impose changes to contractual sick pay and holiday without the union’s consent through collective bargaining. PCS members brought a test case in which the EAT agreed that the collectively agreed contract terms had not changed, notwithstanding the employer’s attempt to impose the changes, and granted a declaration that the employees‘ statutory statement of particulars of employment had not changed. The NAO’s attempted unilateral variation had been ineffective.


Norman & Another v National Audit Office [2014] UKEAT/0276/14/BA 


www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2014/0276_14_1512.html

If contract terms do change, the employer must give the employee a revised written statement of the change within one month of the change (section 4, ERA 96).


The written statement of employment particulars is not the contract of employment, but it is good evidence of the contract terms. However, just because something is left out of the statutory statement of particulars, this does not mean it cannot be a contract term. For example: 


At the start of their employment, a group of employees had signed a document provided by the employer to confirm that their written statements of employment particulars accurately reflected their contract terms. The written statements said nothing about any right to enhanced redundancy pay, although there was a separate redundancy policy in existence which used “contractual” language to promise enhanced redundancy pay. The fact that the written statement of particulars said nothing about this enhanced redundancy pay or that the employees had signed it to confirm that it accurately reflected the contract terms did not prevent them bringing successful contract claims for enhanced redundancy pay. As the EAT noted, many important contract terms are often routinely left out of the statutory written statement of employment particulars. This does not mean they are no longer part of the employment contract.


Allen v TRW Systems [2013] UKEAT/2013/0083/12


www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2013/0083_12_1701.html

European Commission review of Written Statement Directive 


Faced with a growth in insecure working patterns such as zero hours and short hours contracts, not only in the UK but across Europe, the European Commission is consulting on changes to the right of workers to a written statement of their conditions of employment (known as the Written Statement Directive 91/533/EEC). According to the TUC, consideration is being given to adding an obligation to state the number of expected hours and/or a minimum number of hours, which would go some way to protecting zero hours contract workers from the uncertainty of a contract document that states, simply, “zero” or “three” hours, or “hours to be agreed” but which could, in reality, amount to any number of hours (or none), at any time.